Motivation can be defined as a driving force within a person, which can help in the self-voluntary effort of achieving or directing towards a goal (Barnet, n.d). Motivational theory is then the study of how, why and when these behaviours in human are triggered. In, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (1954), the motivation of a person begins at the lowest psychological level. In this report, we gather several motivational theories but select the key motivational theories which influences the employees affective and behaviour processes to a greater level. Also, explore Campion and Thayer’s (1987) motivational approach to design Job to motivate employees.
Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Theory (MASLOW, 1954)
According to Maslow’s (1954) theory, people are motivated according to the pyramid of needs which starts from their physiological level and go all the way up to the level of self-actualization (MASLOW, 1954).
Hierarchy of Needs
1. Physiological Needs (Food, Water)
2. Safety (shelter, protection)
3. Belonging (Relationships, Family, Community)
4. Self-Esteem (Recognition, Achievements)
5. Self-Actualization (Realizing Potential, Fulfilment)
Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory (Herzberg, 1966)
In the motivation-hygiene theory, also known as the two-factor theory, proposed by Frederick Herzberg (1966) suggests that fixing all the job factors which causes dissatisfaction will not guarantee job satisfaction (Teck-Hong, 2011). Herzberg divided the job factors into two, as shown below –
- Hygiene Factors
These are the job factors which must be present in a workplace for motivation to exist. In short, they help in preventing dissatisfaction in a workplace.
- Motivational Factors
Motivational factors are the factors which actually motivates employees to work efficiently and perform well.
|Hygiene Factors||Motivational Factors|
|Policies||Sense of accomplishment|
|Working Environment||Opportunities to Grow|
- McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y
This motivational theory proposed by Douglas McGregor (1957) assumes that there are two types of human behaviour at work. First, Theory X, which presents negative view of individuals in a workplace and second, Theory Y, the positive view (McGregor, 1957).
- Equity Theory
This motivational theory was developed by John Stacey Adams (1963) and is similar to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s motivational theory. Equity theory suggests that factors which are delicate and variable affects the way an employee look at their job (Adams, 1963). In other words, more the sense of equality in an employee more motivated he will be.
- Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
Unlike other motivational theories, Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory (Vroom, 1964) states the motivation of an individual to perform in his/her workplace can be directly related to the reward which is followed after the accomplishment of a task or work (Ferris, 1977).
- Alderfer’s ERG Model
In this theory of motivation, Clayton Alderfer (Alderfer, 1969) simplifies Maslow’s hierarchy of needs into three class’s
- McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory
According to David McClelland’s achievement motivation theory (1961) there are three needs on which behaviour of an individual is depended upon, those are –
- Need for Achievement (McClelland, 1958)
- Need for Power
- Need for Affiliation
Motivational Theories Which Influences Employee’s Affective Processes and Behavioural Processes
From all the above motivational theories mentioned above, Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1954) and McClelland’s Theory of Needs (1961), in my opinion, can influence an employee’s affective processes and behavioural processes the most. Maslow believed that, an employee must be satisfied at his most basic level i.e. his physiological needs, before he can be motivated at a higher hierarchical levels of needs. For example, in an organization, if the employees do not have job security they cannot be motivated at a higher level (Skills, n.d). The constant feel of fear could affect their performance and behaviour. Now, if an employer can provide a sense of security, the employees can motivate themselves to let go off this fear.
Once this level of security need is met, they can now move to a higher level, which is belonging or social aspects, shown in Figure 1. In this hierarchical need, employees can be motivated to work in teams, build good relationships with colleagues or managers etc. Having a good relationship among everyone can foster a good working environment, which in-turn can foster a feeling of happiness (Skills, n.d).
Now, once good relationships are built, the employees can move up the ladder to have a feeling of self-esteem. At this level the employees can be motivated through a good reward system which could help them to gain recognition among others, which help them to meet the required need “self-esteem”. When all the levels are met, the employee can now focus on self-actualization or self-fulfilment. According to Maslow’s Pyramid of Needs, shown in Figure 1, this is the top most level in which employee can be motivated to look for opportunities to learn more and focus on self-improvement (Skills, n.d).
McClelland’s Need Theory, as mentioned in the Motivational Theories section, there are three needs namely need for achievement, need for power and need for affiliation (McClelland, 1962). The need for achievement is one’s desire to excel by setting difficult goals, challenging themselves to achieve success in life. Need for power, is ones desire to control the environment they exist and influence other people’s behaviour. Lastly, the need for affiliation which is the need of one person to create relationship or social networking. According to the McClelland’s need theory, when any one of the three needs is more in an individual, the stronger need can motivate and influence the behaviour of one to reach a point of satisfaction (McClelland, 1962).
Characteristics of a Positive Work Environment
A positive work environment is essential factor to a company’s success. Such environment can help employees to work efficiently, provide motivation that is needed to work and feel good about coming to office every single day (Poh, n.d). A positive work environment can possess the below characteristics –
- Open form of Communication
An open form of communication can help employees feel that their opinions are valued and help in promoting a sense of belonging in their company (English, 2015). This can motivate employees to think creatively and come up with ideas which could help the company grow further. It is therefore an absolute necessity that employers communicate with their employees clearly about the organizations goals, missions and values. This makes sure that everyone is on the same page and make them feel that they are working not only for their salary (Poh, n.d).
- Work-Life Balance
In a positive work environment, employees can balance between their personal life and their work life. They do not have the fear of missing out on one area of their life apart from work, which could be friends, family etc (Poh, n.d). Once the need of belonging are met, employees will be motivated to gain confidence or self-esteem, as stated in Maslow’s Theory of Hierarchy (MASLOW, 1954). A self-confident employee tends to think creatively and out of the box. Therefore, employers or managers should reward those who keep a good work-life balance to motivate others to follow (Poh, n.d).
- Training and Development Based
It is necessary for organizations to keep their employees up to date and trained to adapt to the ever changing business and technology (Poh, n.d). It is crucial that organizations invest on their employees by providing training, so that employees gets a chance to improve and be more productive (AllTopStartUps, 2016). In a world where those who cannot adapt and keep themselves up-to date with the changes get replaced, helping employees to tackle these with training and development needed to keep them abreast of the changes could motivate them repay the favour (Poh, n.d). Therefore, training and development focused organisation can foster a positive working environment by keeping everyone content with their self-fulfilment needs.
- Recognition of Talents
According to Herzberg Two-Factor theory, recognition is a motivational factor which help an employee perform well and efficiently (Herzberg, 1966). By recognising and rewarding talents, employees can be motivated to continually do their best and help improve their satisfaction and productivity. It always does not need to be a monetary reward, a simple verbal recognition about their hard work can also help them realise that they are being appreciated and their hard work is recognised (Poh, n.d).
- Good Working Environments
A good working environment can positively affect the way employees work. Just like when you visit a beautiful place, you feel happy and have a small smile on your face, the same can be achieved if the organisation can look into details like lighting, colour of the walls, flooring and basic necessities (AllTopStartUps, 2016). This could affect the behaviour of employees in a small manner and make them happy at where they work. Happy employees within the organisation could help increase the overall performance and productivity.
How Human Resource Design Jobs to Motivate Employees
According to businessdictionary.com (n.d),
Job design is the work arrangement executed to help prevent or overcome job dissatisfaction at workplaces due to repetitive or monotonous tasks done by an employee. The organization tries to raise the productivity level by offering its employees non-monetary rewards such as sense of accomplishment to meet the challenges through job design.
Human resource can use Campion and Thayer’s (1987) motivational approach among the four job approaches to design jobs which can motivate employees. Campion and Thayer’s (1987) assess the quality of job design through questionnaires. The following are some of the factors on which the questionnaires for motivational job design approach are developed –
Is there freedom in scheduling, improvement decisions and quality?
- Task Significance
Is the job more important than any other job in the company?
Is there good access to communication channels in the job?
Does the job have any recognition amongst others?
- Job Security
Does the person holding the job post have a sense of job security?
Is there any chance of promotion or advance to a higher level in the job post?
Is there an opportunity to interact with team members?
- Task Identity
Does the job require the incumbent to work only on a part of the work or gets to work from beginning till the end of the work?
- Skill Level
Is the skill level required to do the job high?
|Motivational Job Design Approach|
|Implemented for Professional Jobs|
|Job Design Technique used –|
Table 1. Motivational Job Design Approach from Campion and Thayer (1987).
The above method can help in addressing all the physical and emotional aspects of an employee to successfully design a job which motivates employees at their workplace (REDMOND, 2016).
Synthesis of Hackman and Oldham’s (1976) Job Characteristics and Employees’ Psychological States
The well-developed Job Characteristic Model by Hackman and Oldham (1976), which superseded the Two-Factor theory (Garg, 2006), says that the task itself provide motivation to employees. There are five main intrinsic job characteristics and three physiological states in Hackman and Oldham (1976) model and are given below –
- Skill Variety
This defines the different skills and knowledge that needs to be possessed by an employee.
- Task Identity
This defines whether the employee do a task from the beginning to the end or just a part of the task.
- Task Significance
This defines the level of significance their task holds both internally and externally. Internally, how critical is the task for the company. And externally, how proud are they to tell what they do in the society. (Garg, 2006)
This defines the level of independence an employees have to do their job.
This defines the amount of feedback the employee receives in-regard to their performance.
Psychological States –
- Meaningfulness of Work
The extent to which an employee thinks that what they do in the organization is making a difference and worth doing.
- Responsibility for Work Outcomes
The extent to which an employee perceives that they themselves are responsible for the outcome of the work they do.
- Knowledge of Results
It is the degree to which an employee believes the task they have been assigned are being done effectively.
In the model, the intrinsic factors of task identity, skill variety and task significance will all aid in developing a psychological state of meaningfulness. Autonomy will provide the individual with a sense of responsibility for their work outcomes. And finally the feedback provide will help in creating awareness about their performance results (REDMOND, 2016). Figure 3 makes it simple to understand this statement.
The psychological states are responsible for the increased work motivation, satisfaction, productivity, and decline in the number of absenteeism and employee resignation rates (Garg, 2006).
Relationship between Maslow’s General Components and Job Characteristics
To discuss the possible relationship between Maslow’s General Component and Job Characteristics, let us first list all the Maslow’s general components with their respective needs of an employee in an organisation.
Maslow’s General Components in Relation with Need of an Employees at Work
|Maslow’s General Components||Examples Related to Job|
Table 2. Needs of an Employee according to Maslow’s hierarchy of Needs (1954). Source:(YourCoach, n.d)
Let us now compare these Maslow’s needs with that of the Job Characteristics side by side. As shown in Table 3.
|Maslow’s General Component’s||Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs||Job Characteristics|
|Realizing ones maximum potential, Self-Fulfilment||Self-Actualization||Accomplishment at Work, Challenging Tasks|
|Achievements, Recognition, Competence||Self-Esteem||Recognition of Talent or Hard Work, Awards, Promotion|
|Relationships, Love, Family||Belonging||Relationship with Managers, Colleagues and Customers|
|Shelter, Protection, Live Without Fear||Security||Medical Benefits, Fringe Benefits, Job Security|
|Food, Water||Physiological||Coffee, Air Conditioning|
Table 3. Relationship between Maslow’s General Components and Job Characteristics.
Source: (MASLOW, 1954), (Hackman, 1976),(Härtel, 2014).
From the above table 3, we can find some relationship between Maslow’s general Components (1954) and Job Characteristics. As proposed by Hackman and Oldham (1976), the five Job Characteristics are –
- Skill Variety
- Task Identity
- Task Significance
In my own understanding, I could relate the five job characteristics of Hackman and Oldham (1976) in which they need to be satisfied according to the Maslow’s Hierarchy Pyramid as shown below –
|Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs||Five Job Characteristics|
|Self-Esteem||Feedback – Related to Recognition and Performance|
|Belonging||Autonomy – Freedom in communicating and socialising|
|Security||Skill Variety – Related to Job Security|
This shows that just like the hierarchy of needs, where one need to be satisfied with the most basic needs before they can be motivated on a higher level (MASLOW, 1954), similarly, in an organisation to motivate employees, the employers or managers should fulfil the most basic needs of an employee to motivate them on a higher level.
There are several motivational theories to motivate employees and in-turn increase their productivity and performance. However, management should review all the theories and select the one which closely aligns with the goals and missions of the organization. Similarly, the Human Resource should design jobs to motivate by understanding what is required from the job and the employee (Garg, 2006). To conclude, organisations can motivate their employees both intrinsically and extrinsically, but having a balance and understanding of each methods, as they are not additive in nature and can be short lived, to effectively create a system to motivate can help in the affective processes of an employee (Pardee, 1990).
n.d. job design [Online]. WebFinance, Inc. Available: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/job-design.html [Accessed 3rd June 2016].
ADAMS, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67.
ALDERFER, C. P. 1969. An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 142-175.
ALLTOPSTARTUPS. 2016. 5 Characteristics of an Effective And Positive Work Environment [Online]. ALLTOPSTARTUPS. Available: http://alltopstartups.com/2016/01/12/positive-work-environment/ [Accessed 2nd June 2016].
BARNET, T. n.d. MOTIVATION AND MOTIVATION THEORY [Online]. Advameg, Inc. Available: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Mar-No/Motivation-and-Motivation-Theory.html [Accessed 3rd June 2016].
CAMPION, M., & THAYER, P. 1987. Job design: Approaches, outcomes, and trade-offs. Organizational Dynamics, 15, 66-79.
CAULTON, J. R. 2012. The Development and Use of the Theory of ERG: A Literature Review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 5, 2-8.
ENGLISH, W. 2015. 7 Characteristics of a Positive Work Environment [Online]. Day Designer. Available: http://www.blog.daydesigner.com/positive-work-environment/ [Accessed 2nd June 2016].
FERRIS, K. R. 1977. A Test of the Expectancy Theory of Motivation in an Accounting Environment. The Accounting Review, 52, 605-615.
GARG, P. R., RENU 2006. New model of job design:motivating employees’performance. Journal of Management Development, 25, 572-587.
HACKMAN, J. R. O., GREG R. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
HÄRTEL, C. E. J., FUJIMOTO, YUKA 2014. Human Resource Management, Pearson Australia.
HERZBERG, F. 1966. Work and the nature of man, Cleveland, OH, World Publishing Company.
HERZBERG, F. 1987. One More Time: How do You Motivate Employees?, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
MASLOW, A. H. 1954. Motivation and Personality, New York, Harper & Row,Publishers, Inc.
MCCLELLAND, D. C. 1961. The Achieving Society, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
MCCLELLAND, D. C. 1962. Business Drive and National Achievement. Harvard Business Review, 99-112.
MCCLELLAND, D. C., ATKINSON, J. W., CLARK, R. A., & LOWELL, E. L. 1958. A scoring manual for the achievement motive, Princeton, NJ, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
MCGREGOR, D. 1957. The Human Side of Enterprise. The Management Review, 46, 22-28.
MCLEOD, S. A. 2014. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs [Online]. Available: www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html [Accessed 1st June 2016].
PARDEE, R. L. 1990. Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation.
POH, M. n.d. 5 Characteristics of A Positive Work Environmen [Online]. Hongkiat. Available: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/positive-working-environment/ [Accessed 2nd June 2016].
REDMOND, B. F. 2016. Work Attitudes and Job Motivation Home – Brian Redmond [Online]. Pensylvannia State University. Available: https://wikispaces.psu.edu/display/PSYCH484/10.+Job+Design [Accessed 3 June 2016].
SKILLS, P. M. n.d. How Motivation Theories Impact The Workplace [Online]. In-Tuition Learning and Development Ltd. Available: http://www.practical-management-skills.com/motivation-theories.html [Accessed 2nd June 2016].
TECK-HONG, A. W. T. 2011. HERZBERG’S MOTIVATION-HYGIENE THEORY AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE MALAYSIAN RETAIL SECTOR: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF LOVE OF MONEY. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16, 73-94.
VROOM, V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation, John Wiley & Sons.
YOURCOACH. n.d. Maslow hierarchy of needs theory [Online]. YourCoach BVBA. Available: http://www.yourcoach.be/en/employee-motivation-theories/maslow-hierarchy-of-needs-theory.php [Accessed 3rd June 2016].